Planned Finances

February 22, 2008

Exxon Valdez Incident and Consequences

Expertise in earth sciences is very important to a lot of modern businesses, especially those involvedin petroleum production or transportation, industrial manufacturing, or various industries that release waste or by products into the surrounding airor water.

The fact that very large punitive legal damages have been imposed by courts against huge corporations such as Exxon, Union Carbide, and Pacific Gas and Electric serves notice upon businesses that their very survival may well depend upon how their employees deal with earth science related issues

In an effort to emphasize the much importance of the earth science studies to modern corporate businesses, an examination of the massive 1989 oil spill incident in Prince William Sound and how it affected Exxon would be useful. The environmental damage was unprecedented, and initial public anger against Exxon was very high, however Exxon Mobil managed to weather the storm and kept on continuing its operations, mainly because of the efforts of its own earth sciences employees.

The problems all began on March 24, 1989 at four minutes past midnight, when the enormous oil super tanker Exxon Valdez struck a reef hidden under the pristine surface of Alaska?s spectacular Prince William Sound and began spilling vast amounts of crude oil into the sea. In the Alaskan darkness that spring night an environmental nightmare began that changed not only Prince William Sound itself, but the whole world, especially the business world.

In the first weeks after the disaster, upon the advice provided by their own earth sciences people, who understood all very well how much environmental damage might ensue, Exxon volunteered to spend whateverall the money was necessary on cleanup efforts and assessments of environmental damages after the accident and before the settlement. Over two billion dollars was quickly spent by Exxon on these efforts, and the company?s public relations people spared no opportunity to publicize the amount being spent, and to repeatedly mention that it was voluntary, so the public would be aware of that fact and appreciate that Exxon was meeting its responsibilities to the public for the damage done to the environment.

Despite these efforts, nothing could stop the flood of lawsuits which resulted from the spill. After anightmarish thirty months of devastating bad publicity for Exxon, and extremely serious financial losses, a legal settlement agreement was finally reached on October 8, 1991 between the plaintiffs?the State of Alaska and the federal government?and Exxonattorneys on both criminal charges and civil damage claims stemming from the incident.

In settlement of civil charges, Exxonagreed to pay Alaska and the US government over nine-hundred million dollars over a ten year period. This money would be used for environmental and wildlife restoration and would be administered by six government trustees; 3 of them federal appointees, and the other 3 state appointees.

In settlement of criminal charges, it was agreed that Exxon would pay a fine of 250 million dollars. Two restitution funds of fifty million dollars each were found, one under state control and another one under federal authority. Against strong opposition from many Alaskans, 100 and twenty-five million dollars of the balance was forgiven due to Exxon?s cooperation during the cleanup, and because of the upgraded and highly-publicized safety procedures Exxon earth sciences staff had designed to prevent a reoccurring similar event. The remaining fifty million dollars was divided between the Victims of Crime Act account and the North American Wetlands Conservation Fund.

But another huge setback was in store for Exxon. On September 16, 1994, an angry jury in a United States Federal courtroom returned a stunning five billion dollar punitive damages verdict against the corporation. Exxon attorneys have fought this judgment in appeal after lengthy appeal over the last seven years, and on November 7, 2001 won a major victory when United States Court of Appeals justices threw out the 1994 punitive damages verdict.

But Exxon has suffered mightily since the Exxon Valdez went aground in Prince William Sound that fateful night in 1989, and it is not an exaggeration to say that the very existence of the corporation has been at stake. Any business, no matter how large or small, is at the mercy of public approval, for it needs public approval to sell its product. And in Exxon?s case, public approval has been very much dependent upon what the corporation?s earth sciences people have been able to say and do to persuade the public that the environmental damage done is nowhere close to being as damaging as other earth scientists have claimed.

In the 12 years since the oil spill, Exxon has relied heavily upon their own earth sciences personnel, and hired outside earth sciences experts in order to defend themselves against charges that they are liable for billions of dollars in environmental damage to the ecosystem of Prince William Sound.D.Asmar - is the author for Istanbul Property Management Organization?s info center. Please visit Turkish emlakci for additional information

Permalink • Print